Grimes Welcomes AI Collaboration: Shares Royalties on AI-Generated Hits

Grimes Welcomes AI Collaboration: Shares Royalties on AI-Generated Hits

Table of Content

In this article, we’ll explore Grimes’ recent announcement that she’s open to sharing royalties with AI-generated music using her voice and her reasons behind embracing the emerging technology.

Key Takeaways:

  • Grimes announced on Twitter that she’s willing to split 50% royalties on successful AI-generated songs using her voice.
  • The artist encourages AI-based musical projects and doesn’t have any label or legal bindings, making her voice freely available.
  • Grimes has a history of experimenting with new technology and has previously weighed in on AI in music.
  • AI-generated music raises legal and ethical concerns, including copyright infringement.

Grimes Embraces AI in Music

Canadian producer and singer Grimes, whose real name is Claire Boucher, recently made headlines with her openness to collaborate with AI-generated music. 

Through a tweet, she declared her intention to share 50% royalties on successful AI-generated songs featuring her voice. 

Grimes, unbound by any label or legal bindings, has effectively made her voice freely available for AI-based musical projects.

Grimes’ decision to embrace AI in music signals her openness to new technology and innovative approaches to creativity. 

As AI-generated music gains traction, it will be interesting to see how other artists follow Grimes’ lead or respond to the potential disruptions caused by this emerging technology.

Challenges Posed by AI-Generated Music

While AI-generated music is an exciting new frontier, it also presents several challenges. One of the most pressing issues is copyright infringement. 

When AI-generated music borrows elements from existing copyrighted songs, artists and labels may take legal action.

Another concern is the authenticity and uniqueness of music. As AI-generated music becomes more prevalent, it may be difficult to differentiate between human and machine-generated content. 

This could potentially lead to a loss of individuality and personal expression in music.

Additionally, the quality of AI-generated music varies greatly. While some AI-generated songs may be impressive, others may lack the emotion and depth that human artists bring to their work. 

As a result, the music industry will need to determine how to maintain quality standards in the face of AI-generated content.

Grimes’ History with AI and Technology

Grimes has a history of experimenting with new technology both in her music and personal life. 

In a recent example, she claimed to have used a brain-computer interface to control her computer mouse with her mind.

In 2020, Grimes collaborated with mood music startup Endel to create an AI-generated lullaby app, inspired by her desire to improve her son’s sleeping situation. 

Grimes has also made predictions about the role of AI in music, stating in 2019 that generative AI could potentially bring about the “end of human art.” 

She speculated that within 10 to 30 years, AI could master both science and art, surpassing human capabilities.

Grimes’ engagement with AI and technology extends beyond music. She has made controversial comments about AI in the past, including her belief that it could make live music “obsolete soon” and that it represents the “fastest path to communism.”

Legal and Ethical Implications of AI in Music

AI-generated music raises several legal and ethical questions. 

Copyright infringement is a significant concern, particularly when AI-generated music uses elements from existing copyrighted songs. 

While Grimes has made her voice freely available for AI-generated music, other artists and labels may not be as open to the idea.

In March, the US Copyright Office ruled that AI art, including music, originating from a text prompt could not be copyrighted. 

However, the issue remains unsettled, as the door has been left open for granting copyright protections to works with AI-generated elements.

Grimes’ offer to share royalties on successful AI-generated songs using her voice raises questions about the definition of “success” in this context. 

Furthermore, she has warned that copyright takedowns may be pursued in cases of extremely toxic lyrics featuring her voice. 

This adds another layer of complexity to the legal and ethical landscape surrounding AI-generated music.

Grimes’ decision to embrace AI-generated music and share royalties sets a precedent for other artists to potentially follow. 

However, her stipulations, such as avoiding toxic lyrics or overly controversial content, highlight the need for boundaries when working with AI-generated content.

As AI-generated music continues to develop and integrate into various industries, society must grapple with the legal and ethical implications of its use. 

This includes questions surrounding copyright infringement, artistic authenticity, and the potential loss of individuality in music. 

Balancing the benefits of AI-generated music with the need to protect artists’ rights and maintain creative integrity will be an ongoing challenge.


Grimes’ willingness to collaborate with AI-generated music and share royalties demonstrates her openness to new technology and innovative approaches to creativity. 

Her enthusiasm for open-sourcing art and breaking traditional copyright barriers is a bold move, underscoring the potential disruptions AI could bring to the music industry. 

As AI continues to advance and integrate into various industries, the legal and ethical concerns surrounding its use will undoubtedly remain a topic of debate.


Written by


Reviewed By



Judith Harvey is a seasoned finance editor with over two decades of experience in the financial journalism industry. Her analytical skills and keen insight into market trends quickly made her a sought-after expert in financial reporting.