Amazon Takes Legal Action Against False Takedown Requests from Competing Sellers

Amazon Takes Legal Action Against False Takedown Requests from Competing Sellers

Table of Content

In this article, we’ll look at the reasons behind Amazon’s recent lawsuits against alleged fraudulent sellers and the impact these deceptive tactics have on the marketplace. 

We’ll also examine the complexities of copyright enforcement systems and the challenges faced by platforms like Amazon and YouTube.

Key Takeaways:

  • Amazon files lawsuits against sellers for allegedly abusing the takedown system.
  • The accused parties reportedly created fake websites with copied images to claim copyright ownership.
  • Some defendants, like Sidesk, took fraudulent actions even further with fake trademark applications.
  • These cases highlight the difficulty of balancing efficient copyright enforcement with preventing system abuse.
  • Similar issues exist on other platforms, like YouTube.

Amazon’s Legal Action Against Deceptive Sellers

In an effort to combat fraudulent takedown requests, Amazon has filed three lawsuits against groups accused of filing thousands of illegitimate copyright complaints. 

These groups allegedly aimed to hinder competitors’ sales and boost their own merchandise. 

Amazon calls these lawsuits a “new offensive against bad actors” in their ongoing battle against fraud.

The Takedown Fraud Scheme Explained

The accused parties reportedly went beyond just filing fake complaints. 

They are said to have created disposable websites, filled with product images scraped from the Amazon store, and attempted to use these sites as evidence of their copyright ownership. 

This audacious strategy highlights the deceitful lengths some individuals are willing to go to in order to exploit the system.

Sidesk: A Case of Multi-Layered Fraud

One of the defendants, registered under the name “Sidesk,” allegedly went even further in their fraudulent activities. 

Amazon claims that Sidesk submitted a fake trademark application to join the Amazon Brand Registry program, which helps companies manage fraudulent listings. 

Even though the US Patent and Trademark Office denied the trademark application, Sidesk still decided to use it. This made the deception even worse.

The Balancing Act of Copyright Enforcement

These cases underscore the challenges faced by platforms like Amazon in maintaining a balance between allowing legitimate copyright enforcement and preventing system abuse. 

While the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) serves a valid purpose, it can be challenging to keep bad actors from exploiting the system. 

Amazon has implemented various protections, but no system is perfect.

A Widespread Problem: YouTube’s Copyright Claim System

The issue of copyright enforcement abuse extends beyond Amazon. 

YouTubers have long struggled with the platform’s copyright claiming system, which can enable companies and scammers to file illegitimate claims to extort creators or steal their ad revenue. 

If Amazon’s lawsuits prove successful, they may serve as a deterrent for those looking to exploit similar systems.


Amazon’s recent lawsuits against sellers issuing bogus takedown requests on competitors highlight the ongoing challenge of copyright enforcement in digital marketplaces. 

As platforms like Amazon and YouTube grapple with these issues, it remains to be seen whether legal actions like these can deter bad actors and help maintain a fair and competitive online ecosystem.


Written by


Reviewed By



Judith Harvey is a seasoned finance editor with over two decades of experience in the financial journalism industry. Her analytical skills and keen insight into market trends quickly made her a sought-after expert in financial reporting.