EU Eyes Microsoft Azure: An Inquiry into Potential Anti-Competitive Conduct

EU Eyes Microsoft Azure: An Inquiry into Potential Anti-Competitive Conduct

Table of Content

In this article, we’ll dive into the growing concerns surrounding Microsoft Azure’s business practices, as the European Union’s antitrust watchdog initiates an informal probe into alleged anti-competitive behavior. 

Amid acquisitions and previous legal tussles, Microsoft once again finds itself under the microscope.

Key Takeaways:

  • The European Union’s antitrust watchdog is investigating Microsoft Azure for potential anti-competitive behavior.
  • The inquiry follows various complaints about the tech giant, particularly its cloud service product, Azure.
  • The regulatory body has reached out to Microsoft’s customers and competitors, seeking information on how Microsoft handles confidential business information.
  • This isn’t the first time Microsoft has faced legal issues over its cloud business. Earlier this year, it had to settle a lawsuit with OVHcloud, Aruba SpA, and the Danish Cloud Community.
  • Microsoft’s recent acquisition of Activision Blizzard was halted by the UK regulator, adding to the company’s legal woes.

The EU’s Informal Probe into Microsoft Azure: An Overview

The European Union’s regulatory arm has taken a keen interest in the operations of Microsoft Azure. 

This is not a formal examination, but an informal exploration aimed at understanding if there is any truth to claims of anti-competitive behavior.

Microsoft, a prominent figure in the tech world, is once again under the microscope. 

The EU’s antitrust watchdog has initiated this preliminary investigation in light of accusations that Microsoft could be misusing access to sensitive business data, a move that may give them an unfair advantage over other cloud service providers.

Previous Legal Troubles Haunting Microsoft

This isn’t a new situation for Microsoft. Its legal journey has been peppered with various challenges, particularly concerning its cloud service operations. 

Earlier in the year, the company faced a legal storm with several entities: OVHcloud, Aruba SpA, and the Danish Cloud Community. 

The main contention? Allegations of unfair licensing practices that created an uneven playing field.

Microsoft’s response to the claims was a settlement, an action that suggests a desire to maintain a clean image. 

However, this past encounter has done little to deter the attention of regulatory bodies, who continue to scrutinize the tech giant’s practices.

Implications of Microsoft’s Activision Blizzard Acquisition

Meanwhile, Microsoft’s ambitious plans to acquire Activision Blizzard, a giant in the gaming industry, hit a snag. 

The UK regulator raised concerns about the potential influence this move would have on the cloud gaming sector. 

They put a pause on the deal, fearing it could tip the balance of power too heavily in Microsoft’s favor.

The halt of this acquisition underscores the heightened scrutiny that tech giants like Microsoft are facing from regulators around the world. 

It also highlights the increasing importance of competition in the rapidly evolving cloud gaming sector, which has become a significant market in the broader tech industry.

The Role of Customers and Competitors in the Investigation

The process of this informal investigation is reliant on the input of various stakeholders. Customers and competitors of Microsoft have been contacted by the EU regulatory body. 

They have been asked to provide any evidence that could shed light on Microsoft’s handling of sensitive business data.

These entities have been given a deadline of May 16th to respond, and non-confidential versions of their evidence should be submitted by the end of the month. 

The regulator will then delve into this data, using it to determine whether there is a need for a formal investigation.

What this Means for the Future of Cloud-Service Providers

The outcome of this investigation has the potential to reshape the landscape of cloud-service providers. 

If Microsoft is found guilty of anti-competitive behavior, it could lead to fines and possibly the need for the company to revise its business practices.

Furthermore, a verdict against Microsoft could embolden smaller cloud-service providers and pave the way for more competition in the market. 

It could create a more level playing field, which would benefit not only the providers but also the consumers of these services.

In a broader sense, this inquiry also underscores the increasing scrutiny of tech giants and their business practices. 

As technology continues to evolve and companies grow in power and influence, it’s clear that regulators are keeping a close eye on the industry to ensure fair competition and protect consumers.

A New Dawn for Tech Industry Regulation?

As we await the unfolding of events, the tech industry remains on tenterhooks. 

The EU’s informal probe into Microsoft Azure’s business practices could potentially set a new precedent in the realm of tech industry regulation. 

Should Microsoft be found guilty of anti-competitive behavior, the impact could reverberate through the sector, triggering significant changes in the landscape of cloud-service providers.

This scenario could bring forth a new era of heightened accountability for tech giants, fostering an environment where fair competition thrives, and consumer interests are safeguarded. 

Regardless of the probe’s outcome, it’s apparent that the industry’s regulatory future hangs in the balance, underlining the importance of transparency and fairness in all business practices. 

Amid the digital revolution, ensuring a level playing field for all remains an essential goal for regulators and industry stakeholders alike.


Written by

Alexander Sterling

Alexander Sterling

Alexander Sterling is a renowned financial writer with over 10 years in the finance sector. With a strong economics background, he simplifies complex financial topics for a wide audience. Alexander contributes to top financial platforms and is working on his first book to promote financial independence.

Reviewed By



Judith Harvey is a seasoned finance editor with over two decades of experience in the financial journalism industry. Her analytical skills and keen insight into market trends quickly made her a sought-after expert in financial reporting.